Formation of an adaptive model of agricultural production management in the operational management system
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26906/EiR.2026.1%20(100).4377Keywords:
agricultural production management, adaptive management, operational management, agricultural enterprise, operational activity, competitivenessAbstract
The current stage of development of the agricultural sector is characterized by the increasing influence of globalization processes, instability of market conditions, fluctuations in prices for agricultural products, and growing requirements for production quality and performance. Under such conditions, the issue of developing agricultural production management becomes particularly relevant, as the level of organization of operational processes largely determines the economic stability of agricultural enterprises, their ability to adapt to changes in the external environment, and their competitiveness in both domestic and international markets. The development of agricultural production management involves the systematic improvement of operational management, taking into account the sectoral specifics of agriculture, including the seasonality of production processes, the dependence of performance results on natural and climatic conditions, the duration of production cycles, and the increased level of risk. In this regard, traditional approaches to production management require adaptation and supplementation with modern methods of planning, control, and coordination of operational activities. This scientific study is aimed at analyzing the role and identifying the directions for the development of agricultural production management within the operational management system of an enterprise. The research focuses on organizational and economic aspects of managing production processes, as well as on opportunities to increase the performance of operational activities through the improvement of managerial mechanisms and the implementation of modern management tools. Effective organization of operational management covers all key areas of agricultural enterprise functioning, ranging from the planning of production processes and the utilization of resource potential to human resource management and the integration of digital technologies into the management system. Such an approach ensures the consistency of managerial decisions, enables the timely identification of problem areas within the operational system, and facilitates the development of measures aimed at increasing productivity and improving product quality. The improvement of agricultural production management systems creates prerequisites for enhancing the adaptability of enterprises to changing market conditions, optimizing costs, and stabilizing business performance results. Practical experience of agricultural enterprises indicates that focusing production management on strategic development goals contributes to more substantiated managerial decisions and the formation of sustainable competitive advantages. The relevance of this study is determined by the fact that operational activity is a fundamental element of the management system of an agricultural enterprise and defines its ability to ensure sustainable development under conditions of economic instability and increasing risks. The results of the research may be used as a basis for developing practical recommendations aimed at improving the management of operational processes and enhancing the overall performance of agricultural production.
References
1. Christopher M., Peck H. Building the resilient supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Management. 2004. Vol. 15, № 2. P. 1–14.
2. Chopra S., Sodhi M. S. Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Management Review. 2004. Vol. 46, № 1. P. 53–61.
3. Kamble S. S., Gunasekaran A., Dhone N. C. Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing practices for sustainable organisational performance. International Journal of Production Research. 2020. Vol. 58, № 5. P. 1319–1337.
4. Klerkx L., Jakku E., Labarthe P. A review of social science on digital agriculture. NJAS – Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences. 2019. Vol. 90–91. Article 100315.
5. Ponomarov S. Y., Holcomb M. C. Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. The International Journal of Logistics Management. 2009. Vol. 20, № 1. P. 124–143.
6. Scholten K., Stevenson M., van Donk D. P. Dealing with the unpredictable: Supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 2020. Vol. 25, № 1. P. 1–16.
7. Tang C. S. Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications. 2006. Vol. 9, № 1. P. 33–45.
8. Wolfert S., Ge L., Verdouw C., Bogaardt M. J. Big data in smart farming – A review. Agricultural Systems. 2017. Vol. 153. P. 69–80.
9. Андрійчук В. Г. Економіка аграрних підприємств : підручник. 2-ге вид., доповн. і перероб. Київ : КНЕУ, 2002. 624 с.
10. Биба В. В. Конкурентоспроможність сільськогосподарських підприємств України на міжнародних ринках. Науковий вісник Полтавського національного технічного університету імені Юрія Кондратюка. Економіка і регіон. 2017. № 1 (62). С. 95–100.
11. Биба В. В., Ковалець М. В. Чинники, що впливають на прибуток сільськогосподарських підприємств в сучасних умовах. Ефективна економіка. 2016. № 5. URL: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=4960
12. Биба В. В., Махічева П. В. Матеріально-технічне забезпечення сільськогосподарських підприємств України. Науковий вісник Полтавського національного технічного університету імені Юрія Кондратюка. Економіка і регіон. 2017. № 5 (66). С. 69–73.
13. Буяк Л. Концепція програмного забезпечення цифровізації агробізнесу. Український журнал прикладної економіки та техніки. 2022. Т. 7, № 4. С. 327–334.
14. Жукова Л. М., Губа Л. М., Биба В. В. Концептуальні уявлення про межі ефективності управління інноваційним розвитком економіки в умовах глобальної невизначеності. Економіка і регіон. 2023. № 4 (91). С. 24–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26906/EiR.2023.4(91).3189
15. Захаров В. А., Демченко Г. В. Складові ефективного управління операційним менеджментом промислового підприємства. URL: http://repository.hneu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/24862/1/1._DemchenkoZakharov-tezis-1.pdf (дата звернення: 13.01.2026).
16. Кісіль М. І. Особливості управління аграрними підприємствами в умовах нестабільного середовища. Агросвіт. 2022. № 3. С. 22–27.
17. Кичигін А. М. Стійкість підприємства як компонент конкурентоспроможного потенціалу в умовах нестабільності в Україні. Економіка і організація управління. 2025. № 2 (58). С. 156–161.
18. Крамарчук С. П., Лубкей Н. П. Сутність операційного менеджменту та основні етапи його розвитку. Інфраструктура ринку. 2020. Вип. 44. С. 83–86.
19. Правдюк Н. Л., Лепетан І. М., Бурко К. В. Тактичний та стратегічний менеджмент підприємств: обліковий аспект. 2020.
20. Чепа І. І. Адаптація аграрного бізнесу до умов війни: виклики для системи управління. Економіка і організація управління. 2023. № 2. С. 45–52.
1.Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Management, vol. 15(2), pp. 1–14.
2. Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2004). Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Management Review, vol. 46(1), pp. 53–61.
3. Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Dhone, N. C. (2020). Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing practices for sustainable organisational performance. International Journal of Production Research, vol. 58(5), pp. 1319–1337.
4. Klerkx, L., Jakku, E., & Labarthe, P. (2019). A review of social science on digital agriculture. NJAS – Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, pp. 90–91, 100315.
5. Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. International Journal of Logistics Management, vol. 20(1), pp. 124–143.
6. Scholten, K., Stevenson, M., & van Donk, D. P. (2020). Dealing with the unpredictable: Supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, vol. 25(1), pp. 1–16.
7. Tang, C. S. (2006). Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, vol. 9(1), pp. 33–45.
8. Wolfert, S., Ge, L., Verdouw, C., & Bogaardt, M. J. (2017). Big data in smart farming – A review. Agricultural Systems, vol. 153, pp. 69–80.
9. Andriichuk, V. H. (2002) Ekonomika ahrarnykh pidpryiemstv [Economics of agricultural enterprises] (2nd ed.). Kyiv: KNEU. (in Ukrainian)
10. Byba, V. V. (2017). Konkurentospromozhnist silskohospodarskykh pidpryiemstv Ukrainy na mizhnarodnykh rynkakh [Competitiveness of Ukrainian agricultural enterprises in international markets]. Ekonomika i rehion – Economics and Region, vol. 1(62), pp. 95–100.
11. Byba, V. V., & Kovalets, M. V. (2016). Chynnyky, shcho vplyvaiut na prybutok silskohospodarskykh pidpryiemstv v suchasnykh umovakh [Factors influencing profit of agricultural enterprises in modern conditions]. Efektyvna ekonomika – Efficient Economy, no. 5. Available at: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=4960
12. Byba, V. V., & Makhicheva, P. V. (2017). Materialno-tekhnichne zabezpechennia silskohospodarskykh pidpryiemstv Ukrainy [Material and technical support of agricultural enterprises of Ukraine]. Ekonomika i rehion – Economics and Region, vol. 5(66), pp. 69–73.
13. Buiak, L. (2022). Kontseptsiia prohramnoho zabezpechennia tsyfrovizatsii ahrobiznesu [Concept of software support for digitalization of agribusiness]. Ukrainskyi zhurnal prykladnoi ekonomiky ta tekhniky – Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology, vol. 7(4), pp. 327–334.
14. Zhukova, L. M., Huba, L. M., & Byba, V. V. (2023). Kontseptualni uiavlennia pro mezhi efektyvnosti upravlinnia innovatsiinym rozvytkom ekonomiky v umovakh hlobalnoi nevyznachenosti [Conceptual views on the limits of efficiency of innovation management under global uncertainty]. Ekonomika i rehion – Economics and Region, vol. 4(91), pp. 24–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26906/EiR.2023.4(91).3189
15. Zakharov, V. A., & Demchenko, H. V. (2025). Skladovi efektyvnoho upravlinnia operatsiinym menedzhmentom promyslovoho pidpryiemstva [Components of effective operational management of an industrial enterprise], Available at: http://repository.hneu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/24862/1/1._DemchenkoZakharov-tezis-1.pdf
16. Kisil, M. I. (2022). Osoblyvosti upravlinnia ahrarnymy pidpryiemstvamy v umovakh nestabilnoho seredovyshcha [Features of management of agricultural enterprises in an unstable environment]. Ahrosvit – Agrosvit, vol. 3, pp. 22–27.
17. Kychyhin, A. M. (2025). Stiikist pidpryiemstva yak komponent konkurentospromozhnoho potentsialu v umovakh nestabilnosti v Ukraini [Enterprise resilience as a component of competitive potential under instability in Ukraine]. Ekonomika i orhanizatsiia upravlinnia – Economics and Organization of Management, vol. 2 (58), pp. 156–161.
18. Kramarchuk, S. P., & Lubkei, N. P. (2020). Sutnist operatsiinoho menedzhmentu ta osnovni etapy yoho rozvytku [The essence of operational management and the main stages of its development]. Infrastruktura rynku – Market Infrastructure, vol. 44, pp. 83–86.
19. Pravdiuk, N. L., Lepetan, I. M., & Burko, K. V. (2020). Taktychnyi ta stratehichnyi menedzhment pidpryiemstv: oblikovyi aspekt [Tactical and strategic management of enterprises: Accounting aspect].
20. Chepa, I. I. (2023). Adaptatsiia ahrarnoho biznesu do umov viiny: vyklyky dlia systemy upravlinnia [Adaptation of agrarian business to war conditions: challenges for the management system]. Ekonomika i orhanizatsiia upravlinnia – Economics and Organization of Management, vol. 2, pp. 45–52.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Володимир Биба, Наталія Пінчук, Євгенія Карпенко, Марина Адамчук
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
