Research on modes and operating parameters of construction mixes preparing equipment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26906/znp.2023.60.3183Keywords:
Concrete mixtures, concrete mixer, mortar, preparation, energy efficiency, productivityAbstract
This research paper examines the various modes and parameters of operation of equipment used for preparing mortars in the construction industry. The study emphasizes the significance of ensuring the proper functioning of mixers and mixers on construction sites, as it directly affects the time and energy consumption involved in mortar preparation. The paper discusses different types of mixers, including gravity mixers and concrete mixing buckets, and provides an analysis of their advantages and disadvantages. Additionally, the research presents calculations and formulas for determining the power consumption and energy efficiency of mixers. The findings of the study highlight the necessity for a scientific approach in selecting components based on their energy efficiency in construction site conditions. By considering energy efficiency, construction professionals can optimize the performance of mixers and reduce energy consumption, leading to cost savings and environmental benefits. This research contributes to the existing knowledge in the field and provides valuable insights for decision-making in the selection and operation of mortar preparation equipment in the construction industry.
References
1. Nazarenko І., Klymenko M., Svidersky A., Pechersky V. (2017). Definition of rational parameters of drum concrete mixers. GBDMM, 90, 67-72
2. Onishchenko O.G., Popov S.V., Virchenko V.V. (2010). The influence of geometric parameters on the efficiency of the nozzle engagement of mixers for the preparation of building mortar mixes. Collection of scientific papers (Industrial engineering, construction) No. 27, 3–8.
3. Emeljanova I.A., Gordienko A.T., Subota D.Yu. (2018). Features the performance of concrete works at the construction site. Civil Engineering. Scientific bulletin of civil engineering, 3 (93), 205-214
https://doi.org/10.29295/2311-7257-2018-93-3-205-214
4. Emeljanova I.A., Anishchenko A.I., Sorokotyga O.S. (2013). Determination of basic indicators of technology package equipment consisting of concrete mixers gravitational enforcement action and trough belt feeders. Industrial Machine Building, Civil Engineering, 1(36), 9-15
5. Dils, J., De Schutter, G. & Boel, V. (2012). Influence of mixing procedure and mixer type on fresh and hardened properties of concrete: a review. Mater Struct 45, 1673–1683.
https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9864-8
6. Emljanova I.A., Blazhko V. V. (2015). Modern equipment for making smsey building in a construction site. Materials of the IV International Scientific and Technical Conference of Young Scientists and Students. Current problems of modern technologies. Ternopil, 93-94
7. Nazarenko I.I., Klymenko M.O., Chichur A.I., Sakhno S.V. (2011). Promising constructions of truck-mounted concrete mixers. Theory and practice of construction, 7, 2-9
8. Virchenko V.V. (2011). Mixing and construction mortar solutions with the effective mixers. Bulletin of Kremenchuk Mykhailo Ostrohradskyi National University, 1/2011 (66), 71-74
9. Rudyk R., Kuzub Yu (2022). Justification of new equipment development for preparing concrete solutions. Academic journal. Industrial Machine Building, Civil Engineering, 1 (59), 11-16
10 Onishchenko O.G., Vashchenko K.M. (2006). Calculation of power and determination of resistances that arise during the operation of a belt screw mortar mixer. Bulletin of the KDPU: Vol. of science works Kremenchuk: KDPU, No. 1(36), 58-63
11. Onishchenko O.G., Vashchenko K.M. (2004). Development of the design of the hopper-mixer based on the analysis of the design features of the machines for receiving, mixing and dispensing construction mortars. Industrial engineering, construction. Poltava, 6-11.
12. Pochupailo B.I. Advanced concrete mixer (1996). Proceedings of the All-Ukrainian Conf. "Progressive technologies and machines for the production of building materials, products and structures". Poltava, 55-56.
13. B. I. Pochupaylo, V. S. Bohdanov. (1996). To the question of calculating the power of the mixer. Proceedings of the All-Ukrainian Conf. "Progressive technologies and machines for the production of building materials, products and structures". Poltava, 39-40
14. Bogomolov O.O., Chemerichko G.I. (1996). Trends in the improvement of mixing equipment. Proceedings of the All-Ukrainian Conf. "Progressive technologies and machines for the production of building materials, products and structures". Poltava, 38-39
15. Burmistenkov O.P., Bila T.Ya., Statsenko V.V. (2019). The research of energy efficiency for mixing bulk materials equipment. Bulletin of the Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design. Technical Science Series №4 (136), 42-48 https://doi.org/10.30857/1813-6796.2019.4.4
16. Jiapeng Yang, Hua Zeng, Tongqing Zhu, Qi An (2017). Study on the dynamic performance of concrete mixer’s mixing drum. Mechanical Sciences 1 (8), 165-178 https://doi.org/10.5194/ms-8-165-2017
17. Dils, J., De Schutter, G. & Boel, V. (2012). Influence of mixing procedure and mixer type on fresh and hardened properties of concrete: a review. Materials and Structures 45, 1673–1683.
https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9864-8
18. Jon Elvar Wallevik, Olafur Haralds Wallevik (2020). Concrete mixing truck as a rheometer. Cement and Concrete Research, 127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105930
19. Alireza Mokhtar, Mohsen Nasooti (2020). A decision support tool for cement industry to select energy efficiency measures. Energy Strategy Reviews, 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100458
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rostyslav Rudyk, Serhii Bidanets
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
