METHOD OF OPTIMAL LOCATION OF AUGMENTED REALITY OBJECTS

Authors

  • Heorhii Kuchuk
  • Dmytro Lysytsia
  • Dmytro Irkha
  • Dmytro Kyrylenko

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26906/SUNZ.2025.3.112

Keywords:

computer system, augmented reality, virtual object, plane of a real object

Abstract

The object of the study is the process of arranging augmented reality objects in physical space, which is limited in size. The subject of the study is algorithms for the optimal arrangement of augmented reality objects in physical space of finite size. The purpose of the article is to develop a method for the optimal arrangement of augmented reality objects. The following results were obtained. An approach to the formation of the optimal perceptual distance is determined. A mathematical model is developed that allows you to determine the quantitative indicators of two main optimality criteria. An approach to determining the distance between AR objects and the boundaries of the real plane is proposed. The proposed algorithm for the optimal arrangement of augmented reality objects is based on this approach. Conclusions. A method for the optimal arrangement of AR objects is proposed, consisting of a mathematical model, determination of distances to the boundaries of the plane of the real object and the corresponding algorithm. The method allows you to vary the changes of the virtual object in real time.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Kuchuk, H. and Malokhvii, E. (2024), “Integration of iot with Cloud, Fog and Edge computing: a review”, Advanced Information Systems, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 65–78, doi: https://doi.org/10.20998/2522-9052.2024.2.08 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20998/2522-9052.2024.2.08

2. Criollo-C Santiago, Guerrero-Arias Andrea, Guana-Moya ˜ Javier, Samala Agariadne, Lujan-Mora ´ Sergio. Towards sustainable education with the use of mobile augmented reality in early childhood and primary education: a systematic mapping. Sustainability 2024;16(3):1192. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031192

3. Kuchuk, N., Kashkevich, S., Radchenko, V., Andrusenko, Y. and Kuchuk, H. (2024), “Applying edge computing in the execution IoT operative transactions”, Advanced Information Systems, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 49–59, doi: https://doi.org/10.20998/2522-9052.2024.4.07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20998/2522-9052.2024.4.07

4. Atwood-Blaine D, Huffman D. Mobile gaming and student interactions in a science center: the future of gaming in science education’. Int J Sci Math Educ 2017;15:45–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9801-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9801-y

5. Alvarez-Marin Alejandro, Velazquez-Iturbide JAngel. Augmented reality and engineering education: a systematic review. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 2021;14 (6):817–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2022.3144356 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2022.3144356

6. Aivelo T, Uitto A. Digital gaming for evolutionary biology learning: the case study of parasite race, an augmented reality location-based game. LUMAT 2016;4(1): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.4.1.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.4.1.3

7. Ruban, I., Kuchuk, H., Kovalenko, A., Lukova-Chuiko, N. and Martovytsky, V. (2021), “Method for Determining the Structural Reliability of a Network Based on a Hyperconverged Architecture”, Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 976, pp. 147–163, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74556-1_9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74556-1_9

8. El Barhoumi N., Hajji R., Bouali Z., Ben Brahim Y., Kharroubi A. (2022), “Assessment of 3D Models Placement Methods in Augmented Reality”, Applied Sciences, 12 (20), pp. 106–120, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app122010620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app122010620

9. Müller J., Butscher S., Feyer S. P. and Reiterer H. (2017), “Studying collaborative object positioning in distributed augmented realities”, The 16th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, Stuttgart Germany, ACM, pp. 123–132, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3152832.3152856 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3152832.3152856

10. Kyza EA, Georgiou Y. Scaffolding augmented reality inquiry learning: the design and investigation of the Trace Readers location-based, AR platform. Interact Learn Env 2019;27(2):211–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1458039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1458039

11. Laato, Samuli, Heinrich Sobke, ¨ and Manuel F. Baer. 2024. ‘Augmented Future: tracing the trajectory of location-based Augmented reality gaming for the next ten years’. 23(2):189–203. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2024-0018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2024-0018

Published

2025-09-30

Most read articles by the same author(s)