Methodological aspects of institutionalism in the issues of administrative-territorial development

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26906/EiR.2021.4(83).2519

Keywords:

decentralization of powers, executive power, territorial development, institutional matrix, territorial community

Abstract

The irrationality, disproportionality, complexity of the administrative-territorial entities of the united territorial communities are taken into consideration. It is noted, that the application of the institutional methodology of administrative and territorial development is insufficiently studied in domestic and foreign economics. Institutional inadequacy territorial division to the country's needs has been revealed. The ways of executive power institutionalization, the development of territories in accordance with institutionalism requirements, and its role and place in administrative-territorial reform are determined. It is noted that the only institutional set of society is the institutional matrix. The institutional matrix of society is presented as a stable triad of basic elements - macro-institutions that integrate and stabilize society: economy, politics and culture. In forming a matrix, its properties are taken into account, namely the symmetry of dual positions, the interdependence of institutions within matrix, invariance of dominance, the coexistence possibility in the system of maternal matrix of different elements and matrices institutions, with native matrix obligatory dominance. The historical development of states and civilizations, existing by matrix principles above properties effectiveness has proved; otherwise the state disappears, and civilization ceases to exist. It is determined that state and regional institutional transformations generate effective reforms: administrative-territorial, economic, land and other interconnected transformations of society, including political and legal ones. Territorial development and the real economy require a governance system reform within a vertically-level management system into account natural, political, economic, ethnic, linguistic, national and other spatial and social aspects. And modernization of public administration institutions system, decentralization of powers to the level of united territorial communities should form a stable territory development system and safe economic and social environment in regions.

Author Biographies

Grygorii Sharyi, National University «Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic»

Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor

Oleksii Obolenskyi, ДВНЗ «Київський національний економічний університет імені Вадима Гетьмана»

Doctor of Economics, Professor

Svitlana Nesterenko, National University «Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic»

PhD, Associate Professor

Tetiana Odariuk, National University «Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic»

Senior Lecturer

References

Burkinsky, B. V., Goriachyk, V. F., Murzanovskiy, G. M. (2018). The administrative and territorial reform in Ukraine: the system presentation. Economic innovations, Vol. 20, № 3(68) [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31520/ei.2018.20.3(68).8-19

Lukashevych, M. P. Sotsiolohiya ekonomiky. Retrieved from: http://tourlib.net/books_others/lukashevych25.htm

Polany, K. (2002). The great transformation the political and economic origins of our time, Edited by S. E. Phedorov, S.-Peterburg, Russia, 220 p. [in Russian].

Nort, D. Vklad neoynstutsyonalyzma v ponymanye problem perekhodnoy ekonomyky. Retrieved from: https://royallib.com/book/nort_duglas/vklad_

neoinstitutsionalizma_v_ponimanie problem_perehodnoy_ekonomiki.html

Bohoiavlenska, Yu. V., Shaposhnykov, K. S. (2010). Evolyutsiya instytutsionalnoyi teoriyi v konteksti transformatsiyi suchasnykh ekonomichnykh system: Monohrafiya, Zhytomyr, Ukraine, 550 p. [in Ukraine].

Bortis, H. (2007). Instytutsiyi, povedinka ta ekonomichna teoriya: Vnesok do klasyko-keynsianskoyi politychnoyi ekonomiyi; per. z anhl. T. Bardadym, Kiev, Ukraine, 560 p. [in Ukraine].

Nort, D. (2000). Instytutsiyi, instytutsiyna zmina ta funktsionuvannya ekonomiky; per. z anhl. I. Dzyub, Kiev, Ukraine, 198 p. [in Ukraine].

Molodtsov, O. V. (2016). Metodolohichni aspekty teoriyi instytutsionalnykh matryts u konteksti dynamiky instytutsionalnykh zmin. Teoriya ta practika dergavnogo upravlinnya i miscevogo samovryaduvannya. Vol. 2, 19 p. Retrieved from: http://el-zbirn-du.at.ua/2016_2/8.pdf

Administratyvno-terytorialnyi ustriy Ukrayiny: metodolohichni osnovy ta praktyka reformuvannya : monohrafiya, DU «Instytut rehionalnykh doslidzhen imeni M.I. Dolishnoho NAN Ukrayiny»; nauk. red. V.S. Kravtsiv (2016). Lviv, Ukraine, 264 р. [in Ukraine].

Strukturni transformatsiyi v natsionalʹniy ekonomitsi: problemy diahnostyky ta instytutsiynoho zabezpechennya : monohrafiya, Edited by A. F. Melnyk (2012). Ternopilʹ, Ukraine, 175 р. [in Ukraine].

Sharyi, G. I. (2016). Instytutsiyne zabezpechennya rozvytku zemelnykh vidnosyn v ahrarnomu sektori Ukrayiny : monohrafiya. Poltava, Ukraine, 604 р. [in Ukraine].

Huber, R., Buttler, H., Rigling, A. (2013). Sustainable Land-use Practices in European Mountain Regions under Global Change: an Integrated Research Approach. Ecology and Society, Vol. 18 (3) [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05375-180337

Pérez-Soba, M., Paterson, J., Metzger, M., Gramberger, M., Houtkamp, J., Jensen, A. et. al. (2018). Sketching sustainable land use in Europe by 2040: a multi-stakeholder participatory approach to elicit cross-sectoral visions, Regional Environmental Change. Vol. 18 (3), pp. 775–787 [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1297-7

Opdam, P., Foppen, R., Vos, C. (2001). Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning in landscape ecology, Landscape Ecology. Vol. 16 (8), pp. 767–779 [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014475908949

Bubyr, N. (2019). The role of land-use planning for organize the balanced territorial development within the united territorial communities. Proceedings of the 3rd annual conference, pp. 83-85 [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21303/2585-6847.2019.001026

Stoiko, N., Parsova, V. (2017). Environmental dimensions of rural development in land use planning circumstances in Ukraine. Engineering for rural development, pp. 964–969. [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev2017.16.N197

Voronkova, O. Y., Yankovskaya, V., Kovaleva, I., Epishkin, I., Iusupova, I., Berdova, Y. (2019). Sustainable territorial development based on the effective use of resource potential, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, Issues 7(1), pp. 662-673 [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.7.1(47)

Administratyvno-terytorialnyi ustriy krayin Yevropeyskoho Soyuzu, Natsionalʹna academiya dergavnogo upravlinnya pry prezidentovy Ukrayiny»; red. Yu. V. Kovbasuka (2015). Kiev, Ukraine, 628 р. [in Ukraine].

Medeiros, E. (2019). Spatial Planning, Territorial Development, and Territorial Impact Assessment, Journal of Planning Literature. Vol. 34, Issue 2. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412219831375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412219831375

Yemelyanov, V., Shulga, A. (2016). Regulatory framework of local government reform and unification of territorial communities in Ukraine, Рublic policy and economic development: Scientific and Practical Journal. Issue 9 (13), pp. 7-27 [in English].

Downloads

Published

2021-12-08

How to Cite

Sharyi, G., Obolenskyi, O., Nesterenko, S., & Odariuk, T. (2021). Methodological aspects of institutionalism in the issues of administrative-territorial development. Economics and Region, (4(83), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.26906/EiR.2021.4(83).2519

Issue

Section

ECONOMICS AND NATIONAL ECONOMY MANAGEMENT