MANAGEMENT IN CONDITIONS OF GLOBAL CHALLENGES AND MODERN REALITIES. METHODOLOGICAL ASPECT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26906/EiR.2024.4(95).3601

Keywords:

management, methodology, concept, method, global challenges, process, principles, adaptability, adequacy, pragmatism

Abstract

The development of modern economic systems is accompanied by global challenges and problems of modern realities, which have a significant impact on management and determine the need for changes in management methodology, including its key principles, changes in priorities in their selection with an orientation to adequacy, adaptability, pragmatism and professionalism. The article examines the dependence of the effectiveness of the management methodology on global challenges and dynamic problems caused by the unstable realities of today's Ukraine. A considerable number of definitions of the concept of management have been studied and analyzed, systematized and summarized, and an ontological problem has been identified for the solution of which the vision of the authors regarding the definition of the concept of management has been proposed, which outlines its essential features in a concise form. It was established that the effectiveness of the classical management methodology is limited with the growth trend by dynamic changes in circumstances and situations in the external and internal environments, the prevalence of non-linear relationships and non-functional dependencies between the factors of influence on the object of management. Economic systems function and develop in conditions of uncertainty , more situations in organizations are associated with unstructured problems that generate significant riskiness of management decisions. Significant changes to the management methodology and its modernization are proposed. In particular, such an important component as principles. In addition to the well-known classical principles, in particular, the combination of democracy and centralization, authority and responsibility, unity of leadership and collegiality, material and moral stimulation, economy and efficiency, continuity of business decisions, subordination of personal interests to the common, the authors emphasize the importance in the conditions of global challenges and modern realities principles of adequacy, adaptability, pragmatism and professionalism. The presence of many definitions of the concept of management, which on the one hand indicates the ambiguity of this concept, and on the other hand, the multiplicity of definitions of this concept leads to a significant difference in the understanding of what the object of research is, what its purpose and essential features are. To solve this ontological problem, we offer our own definition of the concept of management: management is a purposeful, complex process of managing the joint activities of people using a management methodology relevant to the requirements of specific circumstances. The purpose of this study is to improve and modernize management methodology, which, unlike natural sciences, is not characterized by determinism, accuracy and objectivity. In the course of the study, a combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods of the empirical and theoretical level of modern scientific research paradigms was used, in particular, systematization and generalization, analysis and synthesis in close combination with induction and deduction.

Author Biographies

Volodymyr Gryshko, National University «Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic»

Honored Economist of Ukraine, Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Management and Logistics

Viktor Gryshko, National University «Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic»

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Management and Logistics

References

1.Тлумачний словник української мови. Київ : Українська енциклопедія. 2004. 824 с.

2. Oxford English Dictionary, second edition, edited by John Simpson and Edmund Weiner, Clarendon Press, 1989.

3. Гришко В.В. Методологія наукових досліджень у гуманітарній сфері в умовах діджиталізації та великих даних: проблеми, помилки та перспективи досліджень. Ефективна економіка. 2023. № 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105.2023.8.1

4. Бхаттачерджи А., Ситник Н. Методологія та організація наукових досліджень: дослідження в соціально-економічних науках. Навч. посіб. 2-ге вид., перероб. і доп. Київ : НТУУ «КПІ ім. Ігоря Сікорського», 2022. С. 6–19.

5. Гришко В.В. Квадрат ефективності публічного управління Інвестиції: практика та досвід. 2020. № 17-18. С. 81–84. DOI: http://www.investplan.com.ua/?op=1&z=7154&i=12

6. Вимоги до оформлення дисертацій. Бюлетень вищої атестаційної комісії України. 2011. № 9-10. С. 2–10.

7. Гайдай Т.В. Методологічне забезпечення теорії наукових парадигм для дослідження розвитку економічної науки. Вісник Київського Університету. Економіки. 2005. Вип .75-76. С. 62–65.

8. Сурмін Ю.П. Майстерня вченого: підручник для науковця. Київ : Консорціум із удосконалення менеджмент-освіти в Україні, 2006. 302 с.

9. Ajzen I. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.1991. Vol. 50. P. 179–211.

10. Bacharach S.B. Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation. Academy of Management Review . 1989. Vol. 14(4). P. 496–515.

11. Benbasat I., Goldstein D.K. Mead M. The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems. MIS ані між собою.я. Quarterly. 1987. Vol. 11(3). P. 369–386.

12. Burrell G., Morgan G. Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. Heinemann, 1979. 36 p.

13. Giorgi A., Giorgi B. Phenomenology. Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods, A. Smith (ed.). London : Sage Publications. 2003.

14. Glaser B., Strauss A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicag o: Aldine. 1967.

15. Eisenhardt K.M. Building Theories from Case Research. Academy of Management Review. 1989. Vol. 14(4). P. 532–550.

16. Eisenhardt K. M. Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High-Velocity Environments. Academy of Management Journal. 1989. Vol. 32(3). P. 543–576.

17. Lincoln Y.S., Guba E.G. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. 1985.

18. Markus M.L. Power, Politics, and MIS Implementation. Communications of the ACM. 1983. Vol. 26:6. P.430-444.

19. Markus M.L. Toward a ‘Critical Mass’ Theory of Interactive Media: Universal

20. Access, Interdependence, and Diffusion. Communication Research. 1987.

1. Tlumachnyi slovnyk ukrainskoi movy [Explanatory Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language]. (2004) Vydavnytstvo "Ukrainska entsyklopediia", 824 p.

2. John Simpson and Edmund Weiner (eds.) (1989) Oxford English Dictionary, second edition. Clarendon Press.

3. Hryshko V. V. (2023) Metodolohiia naukovykh doslidzhen u humanitarnii sferi v umovakh didzhytalizatsii ta velykykh danykh: problemy, pomylky ta perspektyvy doslidzhen [Methodology of scientific research in the humanities under conditions of digitalization and big data: problems, mistakes, and research prospects]. Efektyvna ekonomika. no. 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105.2023.8.1

4. Bhattacherji A., Sytnyk N. (2022) Metodolohiia ta orhanizatsiia naukovykh doslidzhen: doslidzhennia v sotsialno-ekonomichnykh naukakh [Methodology and organization of scientific research: research in socio-economic sciences]. 2nd ed., revised and expanded. Kyiv: NTUU "KPI im. Ihoria Sikorskoho", pp. 6–19.

5. Hryshko V. V. (2020) Kvadrat efektyvnosti publichnoho upravlinnia [The efficiency square of public administration]. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid. Kyiv. No. 17-18. pp. 81–84. DOI: http://www.investplan.com.ua/?op=1&z=7154&i=12

6. Vymohy do oformlennia dysertatsii [Requirements for dissertation formatting]. Biuleten vyshchoi atestatsiinoi komissii Ukrainy. (2011). No. 9-10. pp. 2–10.

7. Haidai T. V. (2005) Metodolohichne zabezpechennia teorii naukovykh paradyhm dlia doslidzhennia rozvytku ekonomichnoi nauky [Methodological support for the theory of scientific paradigms for the study of the development of economic science]. Visnyk Kyivskoho Universytetu. Ekonomiky. issue 75-76. pp. 62–65.

8. Surmin Y. P. (2006) Maisternia vchenoho: pidruchnyk dlia naukovtsia [The Scientist's Workshop: A Textbook for Researchers]. Kyiv: Konsortsium iz udoskonalennia menedzhment-osvity v Ukraini, 302 p.

9. Ajzen I. (1991) The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. vol. 50. pp. 179–211.

10. Bacharach S. B. (1989) Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation. Academy of Management Review. vol. 14(4). p. 496–515.

11. Benbasat I., Goldstein D. K. Mead M. (1987) The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems. MIS Quarterly. vol. 11(3). pp. 369–386.

12. Burrell G., Morgan G. (1979) Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis, Heinemann, 36 p.

14. Giorgi A., Giorgi B. (2003) Phenomenology. Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods, A. Smith (ed.). London: Sage Publications.

14. Glaser B., Strauss A. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.

15. Eisenhardt K. M. (1989) Building Theories from Case Research. Academy of Management Review. vol. 14(4). pp. 532–550.

16. Eisenhardt K. M. (1989) Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High-Velocity Environments. Academy of Management Journal. vol. 32(3). pp. 543–576.

17. Lincoln Y. S., Guba E. G. (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

18. Markus M. L. (1983) Power, Politics, and MIS Implementation. Communications of the ACM. vol. 26:6. pp. 430–444.

19. Markus M. L. Toward a ‘Critical Mass’ Theory of Interactive Media: Universal

20. Access, Interdependence, and Diffusion. Communication Research. (1987).

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Gryshko, V., & Gryshko, V. (2024). MANAGEMENT IN CONDITIONS OF GLOBAL CHALLENGES AND MODERN REALITIES. METHODOLOGICAL ASPECT. Economics and Region, (4(95), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.26906/EiR.2024.4(95).3601

Issue

Section

ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION