Institutional Mechanisms of Land Development Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26906/EiR.2020.4(79).2157Keywords:
land development, institute, institutional economy, methodology, land economy, rent relations, ecological rentAbstract
A new institutional and neo-institutional theory theoretical apparatus in the field of land economy are revised and the necessity for further land development institutionalization in Ukraine is determined. Social economic relations are analyzed. It is revealed that land relations have an essential structure: in the form of an institutional complex, based on the traditional, customary and religious norms of individuals behavior, as well as social, political, economic, legal and other institutions, as stable socio-economic, organizational and legal structures, institutions and organizations. The main principles of new institutional and neo-institutional economy in the land sphere are determined, namely institute-centrism, limited rationality, historicism, economic opportunism, land good. The relationship nature of land relations institutionalization means with peculiarities of state financial and economic space formation in the author's interpretation is considered at the development level in Ukraine of land circulation institutional infrastructure, The State Land Bank and the National Land Fund formation as state institutions. It has been found that evolutionary institutional changes are inherent in social land development when partial peripheral gradual changes in rules and regulations cause gradual changes and land development. It is proved that state, having administrative advantages, acting by economic methods and methods of legal influence, should change and adapt the institutional environment, as a set of rules, norms that form the basis of production, exchange and redistribution in the land sphere, because the main link in the bundle of land rights, belongs to the people of Ukraine.
References
Veblen, T. (1984). Teoriya prazdnogo klassa [Theory of the idle class], Progres. Moscow, 342 p. [in Russian].
Nureyev, R. M. (2010). Ocherki po istorii institutsionalizma [Essays on the history of institutionalism]. 2-ye izd. Rostov-na-Donu : Sodeystviye – XXI vek, 415 p. [in Russian].
Cosens, B. A., Craig, R. K., Hirsch, S., Arnold, C. A. (T.), Benson, M. H., DeCaro, D. A., Garmestani, A. S., Gosnell, H., Ruhl, J. & Schlager, E. (2017). The role of law in adaptive governance. Ecology and Society, Vol. 22(1):30 [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08731-220130
Anderies, J. M., Janssen, M. A. & Ostrom, E. (2004). А framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecology and Society, Vol. 9(1):18 [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00610-090118
DeCaro, D. A., Stokes, M. K. (2013). Public participation and institutional fit: a social-psychological perspective. Ecology and Society, Vol. 18(4): 40 [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05837-180440
Yaremenko, V. V., Slipushko, O. M. (2008). Novyi tlumachnyi slovnyk ukrayinskoi movy [New Interpretative Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language]. U 3-kh t. Kiev, Ukraine, 862 p. [in Ukrainian].
Epstein, G., Pittman, J., Alexander, S. M., Berdej, S., Dyck, T., Kreitmair, U., Raithwell, K. J., Villamayor-Tomas, S., Vogt, J. & Armitage, D. (2015). Institutional fit and the sustainability of social-ecological systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Vol. 14, pp. 34–40 [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.005
Sharyi, H. I. (2016). Instytutsiine zabezpechennia rozvytku zemelnykh vidnosyn v ahrarnomu sektori Ukrainy : monohrafiia. Poltava, 604 р. [in Ukrainian].
Ivashchenko, O. (2003). Novyi instytutsionalizm v ekonomichnii sotsiolohii [New institutionalism in economic sociology]. Sotsiolohiia: teoriia, metodyky, marketynh, Vol. 1, pp. 60–70 [in Ukrainian].
Sharyi, H. I., Tymoshevskyi, V. V., Fesak, A. S. (2018). Ahroekolohichni perspektyvy – ne zahubyty nadbane! [Agro-ecological perspectives – do not lose the good!], Zemlevporiadnyi visnyk. Kyiv, Vol. 8, pp. 25–30 [in Ukrainian].
Chaffin, B. C., Gunderson, L. H. (2016). Emergence, institutionalization and renewal: rhythms of adaptive governance in complex social-ecological systems. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 165, pp. 81–87 [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.003
Ulko, Ye. M. (2015). Instytutsionalna skladova ekonomichnoho rozvytku tvarynnytstva na osnovi dyferentsiatsii vplyvu instytutsii ta instytutiv [Institutional component of economic development animal husbandry on the basis of differentiation of influence of institutions and institutes]. Visnyk Khark. Nats. Ahrarn. Un.-tu im. V.V. Dokuchaieva. Ser.: «Ekon. Nauky». Kharkiv, Vol. 2, pp. 131–142 [in Ukrainian].
Holling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems, Vol. 4(5), pp. 390-405 [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
Chaffin, B. C., Gosnell, H. & Cosens, B. A. (2014). A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: synthesis and future directions. Ecology and Society, Vol. 19(3): 56 [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06824-190356
Dyuverzhe, M. (1997). Politicheskiye instituty i konstitutsionnoye pravo [Political Institutions and Constitutional Law]. Antologiya mirovoy politicheskoy mysli. V 5 t. – T. 2. Zarubezhnaya politicheskaya mysl' XX v. Nats. obshchestv.-nauch. fond. Akad. polit. nauk; Rukovoditel' proyekta G.Yu. Semegin i dr.; Red-nauch. sovet: pred. soveta G.Yu. Semegin i dr. Moscow: Mysl', pp. 644–655 [in Russian].
DeCaro, D. A., Chaffin, B. C., Schlager, E., Garmestani, A. S. & Ruhl, J. B. (2017). Legal and institutional foundations of adaptive environmental governance. Ecology and Society, Vol. 22(1): 32 [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09036-220132
Clark, W. C., Jones, D. D. & Holling, C. S. (1979). Lessons for ecological policy design: a case study of ecosystem management. Ecological Modelling, Vol. 7(1), pp. 1–53 [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(79)90008-5
Clement, F. (2010). Analysing decentralised natural resource governance: proposition for a «politicised» institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Sciences, Vol. 43(2), pp. 129–156 [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9100-8
Anderies, J. M., Janssen, M. A. (2013). Robustness of social-ecological systems: implications for public policy. Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 41(3), pp. 513–536 [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12027
Berkes, F. (2007). Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 104(39), pp. 188–193 [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702098104
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
