RESEARCH ON THE SENSITIVITY OF THE DISTANCE MEASUREMENT METHOD BASED ON THE FACEMESH ALGORITHM

Authors

  • O. Barkovska
  • A. Shapiro
  • O. Mavrynskyi
  • P. Zhebin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26906/SUNZ.2025.2.076

Keywords:

distance measurement, FaceMesh, computer vision, monocular geometry, resolution, lighting, head tilt

Abstract

Relevance. The article explores a method for estimating the distance to a user's face under varying lighting conditions, camera resolution, and head tilt angles. This method is significant for developing adaptive computer vision systems in medical, educational, and navigational applications. The goal of the research is to analyze the accuracy of distance measurement to an indoor object using a geometric approach based on the FaceMesh algorithm under variable external factors. The tasks include determining the impact of lighting quality, head position, and camera resolution on measurement accuracy; implementing a distance estimation algorithm using facial landmarks; conducting experiments; and formulating recommendations for the proposed method. The following methods were used: monocular geometry with the FaceMesh algorithm and real-time video processing techniques. As a result of the experimental studies, it was confirmed that the optimal conditions for accurate distance measurement are a frontal face position relative to the camera, a resolution of 640×480, and lighting above 200 lux. The error increases at tilt angles exceeding 15° and under low lighting. Under these conditions, the FaceMesh algorithm demonstrates an error of less than 3% at distances up to 90 cm. Conclusions. The method is suitable for use in real-time mobile systems with limited resources and has potential for further integration into multimodal recognition systems and adaptive navigation platforms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Dietrich, O., et al. (2025). An Open-Source Tool for Mapping War Destruction at Scale in Ukraine Using Sentinel-1 Time Series. arXiv:2406.02506, arXiv, 20 Feb. 2025. arXiv.org. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.02506.

2. Barkovska, O., Oliinyk, D., Sorokin, A., Zabroda, I., & Sedlaček, P. (2024). A system for monitoring the progress of rehabilitation of patients with musculoskeletal disorder. Advanced Information Systems, 8(3), 13-24.

3. Barkovska, O., & Serdechnyi, V. (2024). Intelligent Assistance System for People with Visual Impairments. INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES AND SCIENTIFIC SOLUTIONS FOR INDUSTRIES, (2)28, 6–16. DOI.org (Crossref). https://doi.org/10.30837/2522-9818.2024.28.006.

4. Kunczik, J., et al. (2022). Breathing pattern monitoring by using remote sensors. Sensors, 22(22), 8854.

5. Deng, Z., et al. (2023). Smart Wearable Systems for Health Monitoring. Sensors, 23(5), 2479. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23052479.

6. Kaur, B., et al. (2023). Novel Wearable Optical Sensors for Vital Health Monitoring Systems—A Review. Biosensors, 13(2), 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13020181.

7. Olmedo-Aguirre, J. O., et al. (2022). Remote Healthcare for Elderly People Using Wearables: A Review. Biosensors, 12(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12020073.

8. Adeghe, E. P., et al. (2024). A Review of Wearable Technology in Healthcare: Monitoring Patient Health and Enhancing Outcomes. Open Access Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 7(1), 142–148. https://doi.org/10.53022/oarjms.2024.7.1.0019.

9. Wang, W., et al. (2016). Algorithmic principles of remote PPG. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 64(7), 1479-1491.

10. Tırınk, C., et al. (2023). Estimation of body weight based on biometric measurements by using random forest regression, support vector regression and CART algorithms. Animals, 13(5), 798.

11. Di, H., Shafiq, M., & AlRegib, G. (2018). Patch-level MLP classification for improved fault detection. SEG technical program expanded abstracts 2018. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2211-2215.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-19