Проєктно-орієнтоване управління з використанням інтелектуально-інноваційних рішень

Olena Toporkova; Yevhenii Kovalchuk; Ivan Dolgushyn

doi:10.26906/EiR.2025.1(96).3759

Authors

Olena Toporkova Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0956-3638
Yevhenii Kovalchuk Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6494-4261
Ivan Dolgushyn Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3959-5351

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26906/EiR.2025.1(96).3759

Keywords:

projects, management, innovations, intellectualization, development, business environment

Abstract

Innovation can provide new opportunities to improve project efficiency. The current study is devoted to substantiating the importance of innovation and the feasibility of using intellectual analysis tools in project management practice. To take into account the peculiarities of innovation, there is a need to clarify the concept of evaluation and selection of priority project decisions. The result of project evaluation is their classification and diagnostics according to the selected goals and development priorities of the relevant hierarchical level. The success of innovative activity depends on such factors as: access to resources (financial, material, information); regulatory and legal support for the creation, commercialization and legal support of innovations; availability of qualified and motivated personnel. Given the rapid development of digital technologies in all spheres and industries, information support is positioned as an integrated computer and telecommunication system that widely uses intelligent analysis tools not only for data processing but also for making management decisions at any level. The practical implementation and achievement of the goals of innovative development projects is ensured by the synergy of knowledge, tools, principles, and processes of project-oriented management. The authors have systematized the components of project-oriented management, highlighting the market, regulatory, and iterative components. An innovative and intelligent decisions is the application of an iterative approach, according to which the set of project management technologies and tools are adjusted as updated data becomes available. This approach will enhance responsibility for decisions made at each hierarchical level. The scope of application and tools for intelligent analysis at the micro level have been agreed upon. Emphasis is placed on shifting the focus from managing a specific project to managing a portfolio of projects at the business unit, industry, and regional levels. The specifics of such management require the development of a new methodological approach and a significant transformation of existing models for evaluating the effectiveness of programs, projects and project portfolios.

Author Biographies

Olena Toporkova, Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Docent, Associate Professor at the Department of Finance, Accounting and Psychology

Yevhenii Kovalchuk, Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies

Postgraduate Student

Ivan Dolgushyn, Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies

Postgraduate Student

References

1. Klaus-Rosińska A., Walecka-Jankowska K., Zgrzywa-Ziemak A. The significance of knowledge management processes for business sustainability: the role of sustainability-oriented projects. Humanities and Social Sciences. Research Journal 31, 2024. № 1. P. 65–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2024.hss.04

2. Silvius G., Marnewick C. Interlinking Sustainability in Organizational Strategy, Project Portfolio Management and Project Management a Conceptual Framework. Procedia Computer Science, 2022. № 196, P. 938–947. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCS.2021.12.095

3. Klijn E. H., Metselaar S., Warsen R. The effect of contract- and network management on performance and innovation in infrastructure projects. Public Money & Management, 2023. № 44(5), P. 428–437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2023.2204533

4. Satheesh S. A., Verweij S., Busscher T., Arts J. Drivers of innovation in infrastructure development projects: A configurational analysis of boundary spanning roles. International Journal of Project Management, 2024. № 42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102620

5. Koppenjan J., Klijn E. H., Verweij S., Duijn M., van Meerkerk I., Metselaar S., Warsen R. The Performance of Public–Private Partnerships: An Evaluation of 15 Years DBFM in Dutch Infrastructure Governance. Public Performance & Management Review, 2022. № 45(5), P. 998–1028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2062399

6. Acharya C., Ojha D., Gokhale R., Patel P. C. Managing information for innovation using knowledge integration capability: The role of boundary spanning objects. International Journal of Information Management, 2022. № 62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102438

7. Cantarelli C. C. Innovation in megaprojects and the role of project complexity. Production Planning & Control, 2020. № 33(9–10), P. 943–956. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1837934

8. Nikulina A., Volker L., Bosch-Rekveldt M. The interplay of formal integrative mechanisms and relational norms in project collaboration. International Journal of Project Management, 2022. № 40(7), P. 798–812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.08.006

9. Старченко Г. В. Принципи проєктно-орієнтованого управління інноваційним розвитком національної економіки. Економіка та суспільство, 2021. № 27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2021-27-4

10. Ханін С. Г. Інтелектуально-інноваційні детермінанти розвитку регіональних економічних систем. Економічний вісник НТУУ «Київський політехнічний інститут», 2021. № 19. С. 187–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20535/2307-5651.19.2021.240537

11. Карасаєв К. К. Концептуальні засади побудови регіонального бізнес-середовища. Інвестиції: практика та досвід, 2024. № 23. С. 130–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6814.2024.23.130

12. Понедільчук Т., Приходько Т. Теоретичні підходи до формування середовища розвитку підприємництва. Економічний дискурс, 2022. № 3–4. С. 50-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36742/2410-0919-2022-2-5

13. Чайковська І. І. Управління знаннями на проєктно-орієнтованих підприємствах. Український журнал прикладної економіки та техніки, 2021. Том 6. № 4. C. 67–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2021-4-9

14. Марценюк О. В., Руда О. Л., Озвенчук О. А. Можливості оптимізації бізнес-процесів та впровадження інноваційних рішень і нових технологій. Ефективна економіка, 2024. № 8. DOI: http://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105.2024.8.74

15. Островська Г. Й., Островський О. Т. Застосування інтелектуальних інформаційних систем в контексті управління промисловими підприємствами. Маркетинг і цифрові технології, 2023. № 1. Том 7. С. 69–81. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15276/mdt.7.1.2023.5

1. Klaus-Rosińska A., Walecka-Jankowska K., & Zgrzywa-Ziemak A. (2024) The significance of knowledge management processes for business sustainability: the role of sustainability-oriented projects. Humanities and Social Sciences. Research Journal 31, no. 1, pp. 65–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2024.hss.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2024.hss.04

2. Silvius G., & Marnewick C. (2022) Interlinking Sustainability in Organizational Strategy, Project Portfolio Management and Project Management a Conceptual Framework. Procedia Computer Science, no. 196, pp. 938–947. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCS.2021.12.095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.095

3. Klijn E. H., Metselaar S., & Warsen R. (2023) The effect of contract- and network management on performance and innovation in infrastructure projects. Public Money & Management, no. 44(5), pp. 428–437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2023.2204533 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2023.2204533

4. Satheesh S. A., Verweij S., Busscher T., & Arts J. (2024) Drivers of innovation in infrastructure development projects: A configurational analysis of boundary spanning roles. International Journal of Project Management, no. 42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102620

5. Koppenjan J., Klijn E. H., Verweij S., Duijn M., van Meerkerk I., Metselaar S., & Warsen R. (2022) The Performance of Public–Private Partnerships: An Evaluation of 15 Years DBFM in Dutch Infrastructure Governance. Public Performance & Management Review, no. 45(5), pp. 998–1028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2062399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2062399

6. Acharya C., Ojha D., Gokhale R., & Patel P. C. (2022) Managing information for innovation using knowledge integration capability: The role of boundary spanning objects. International Journal of Information Management, no. 62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102438 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102438

7. Cantarelli C. C. (2020) Innovation in megaprojects and the role of project complexity. Production Planning & Control, no. 33(9–10), pp. 943–956. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1837934 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1837934

8. Nikulina A., Volker L., & Bosch-Rekveldt M. (2022) The interplay of formal integrative mechanisms and relational norms in project collaboration. International Journal of Project Management, no. 40(7), pp. 798–812 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.08.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.08.006

9. Starchenko G. V. (2021) Pryntsypy proiektno-oriientovanoho upravlinnia innovatsiinym rozvytkom natsionalnoi ekonomiky [Principles of project-oriented management of innovative development of the national economy]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, no. 27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2021-27-4 (in Ukrainian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2021-27-4

10. Khanin S. H. (2021) Intelektualno-innovatsiini determinanty rozvytku rehionalnykh ekonomichnykh system [Intellectual and innovative determinates of development of regional economic systems]. Economic bulletin of National Technical University of Ukraine “Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, no. 19. pp. 187–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20535/2307-5651.19.2021.240537 (in Ukrainian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.20535/2307-5651.19.2021.240537

11. Karasaiev K. K. (2024) Kontseptualni zasady pobudovy rehionalnoho biznes-seredovyshcha [Conceptual principles for construction a regional business environment]. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid, no. 23. pp. 130–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6814.2024.23.130 (in Ukrainian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6814.2024.23.130

12. Ponedilchuk T. & Prykhodko T. (2022) Teoretychni pidkhody do formuvannia seredovyshcha rozvytku pidpryiemnytstva [Theoretical approaches to the formation of environment for entrepreneurship development]. The economic discourse, no. 3–4, pp. 50–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36742/2410-0919-2022-2-5 (in Ukrainian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.36742/2410-0919-2022-2-5

13. Chaikovska I. (2021) Upravlinnia znanniamy na proiektno-oriientovanykh pidpryiemstvakh [Knowledge management at project-oriented enterprises]. Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology, vol. 6. no. 4, рр. 67–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2021-4-9 (in Ukrainian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2021-4-9

14. Martseniuk O., Ruda O. & Ozvenchuk, O. (2024) Mozhlyvosti optymizatsii biznes-protsesiv ta vprovadzhennia innovatsiinykh rishen i novykh tekhnolohii [Opportunities for optimizing business processes and implementing innovative solutions and new technologies]. Efektyvna ekonomika, no. 8. DOI: http://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105.2024.8.74 (in Ukrainian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105.2024.8.74

15. Ostrovska H. & Ostrovskyy O. (2023) Zastosuvannia intelektualnykh informatsiinykh system v konteksti upravlinnia promyslovymy pidpryiemstvamy [The application of intellectual information systems in the context of industrial enterprises management]. Marketing and Digital Technologies, vol. 7. no. 1, pp. 69–81. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15276/mdt.7.1.2023.5 (in Ukrainian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15276/mdt.7.1.2023.5