Оцінка потенціалу вторинного ресурсовикористання твердих побутових відходів територіальних громад

Oleksii Shkuratov; Oleksandr Samoilov

doi:10.26906/EiR.2024.4(95).3615

Authors

Oleksii Shkuratov Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8656-723X
Oleksandr Samoilov Separate Structural Unit «Institute of Innovative Education of the Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture» https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5520-5714

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26906/EiR.2024.4(95).3615

Keywords:

solid household waste, potential assessment, territorial communities, secondary resource utilization, resource potential, infrastructure provision

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to substantiate a methodological approach to assessing the potential for secondary resource utilization of solid household waste in territorial communities. Effective solid waste management plays a key role in preserving the environment and ensuring the health of residents. The use of innovative technologies will allow for the maximum use of the potential of solid waste to create a sustainable and environmentally friendly society. In our opinion, increasing the volume of solid waste involved in recovery can contribute to improving the quality of the environment and improving the economic performance of business entities and territorial systems in general. However, to implement the solid waste management process, it is necessary to determine whether the necessary conditions exist for the effective use of the existing potential in this area – economic, technological, production, environmental and others, or whether they should be specified taking into account the tasks set for management entities. In general, the potential for secondary use of solid household waste is developing based on the resource balance of territorial communities and the efficiency of its functioning. The potential for secondary resource utilization of solid household waste is considered as a set of available resources necessary for the removal or recovery of solid household waste, and the existing system of infrastructure support for these processes. Effective implementation of the potential for secondary resource utilization of solid household waste is largely determined by the balance of available resources and assumes the sustainability of infrastructure, which should be assessed and adjusted in accordance with the waste management program of the studied territorial communities. The article proposes criteria for the potential for secondary resource utilization of solid household waste in territorial communities. An algorithm for assessing the attractiveness of territorial communities for secondary resource utilization of solid household waste has been developed. A methodological approach to assessing the potential for secondary resource utilization of solid household waste in territorial communities is proposed, which involves taking into account, in addition to the resource component of the potential, the infrastructure component, which allows for the full development of waste for useful purposes. Based on the results of the calculation of the integral index of the potential level of secondary resource use of solid household waste of territorial communities, according to the proposed methodical approach, it is possible to evaluate the object according to the proposed classification.

Author Biographies

Oleksii Shkuratov, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Vice-Rector for Scientific and Pedagogical Work and Strategic Development

Oleksandr Samoilov, Separate Structural Unit «Institute of Innovative Education of the Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture»

PhD in Economics, Director

References

1. AI-Salem S., Lettieri P., Baeyens J. Recycling and recovery routes of plastic solid waste (PSW). A review. Waste Management. 2009. Vol. 29(10). P. 2625–2643.

2. Веклич О.О. Економічний механізм екологічного регулювання в Україні: монографія. Київ : Український інститут досліджень навколишнього середовища і ресурсів, 2003. 88 с.

3. Wilson D., Velis C., Cheeseman C. Role of informal sector recycling in waste management in developing countries. Habitat International, 2006. Vol. 30(4). P. 797–808.

4. Дзюбинська О.В., Фесіна Ю.Г., Дзюбинський А.В., Смаль М.В. Використання потенціалу твердих побутових відходів регіону на засадах кругової економіки (на прикладі Волинської області): монографія. Луцьк: Вежа, 2022. 255 с.

5. Колодійчук І.А. Територально збалансований підхід у сфері управління відходами. The scientific heritage. 2021.№ 68. С. 10–14.

6. Міщенко В.С., Виговська Г.П. Організаційно-економічний механізм поводження з відходами в Україні та шляхи його вдосконалення. Київ : Наукова думка. 2009. 294 с.

7. Шишпанова Н.О. Сучасне управління відходами в громадах відповідно до принципів циркулярної економіки. Економіка та суспільство. 2023. № 49. URL: https://economyandsociety.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/2323

8. Ступень Н.М. Комплексний еколого-економічний аналіз потенціалу рекреаційних територій. Ефективна економіка. 2017. № 8. URL: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=6036

9. Ступень Н.М. Еколого-економічний механізм розвитку рекреаційних територій: монографія. Київ : ДКС-Центр, 2017. 312 с.

10. Шкуратов О.І. Організаційно-економічні основи екологічної безпеки в аграрному секторі України: теорія, методологія, практика: монографія. Київ : ДКС Центр, 2016. 356 с.

11. Паляничко Н.І., Самойлов О.О. Розвиток інструментарію організаційно-економічного механізму управління твердими побутовими відходам. Збалансоване природокористування. 2024.№ 1. С. 23–29.

12. Захожай В.Б., Корецька О.В. Методика розрахунку інтегрального показника інноваційної спрямованості підприємств. Наукові праці МАУП. 2015. Вип. 44(1). С. 158–165.

13. Harrington E.C. The desirable function. Industrial Quality Control. 1965. Vol. 21. № 10. P. 494–498.

1. AI-Salem S., Lettieri P., Baeyens J. (2009) Recycling and recovery routes of plastic solid waste (PSW). A review. Waste Management, vol. 29(10), pp. 2625–2643.

2. Veklych O. O. (2003) Ekonomichnyi mekhanizm ekolohichnoho rehuliuvannia v Ukraini [The economic mechanism of environmental regulation in Ukraine]. Kyiv: Ukrainskyi instytut doslidzhen navkolyshnoho seredovyshcha i resursiv. (in Ukrainian)

3. Wilson D., Velis C., Cheeseman C. (2006) Role of informal sector recycling in waste management in developing countries. Habitat International, vol. 30(4). pp. 797–808.

4. Dziubynska O. V., Fesina Yu. H., Dziubynskyi A. V., & Smal M. V. (2022) Vykorystannia potentsialu tverdykh pobutovykh vidkhodiv rehionu na zasadakh kruhovoi ekonomiky (na prykladi Volynskoi oblasti) [Using the potential of solid household waste in the region on the basis of the circular economy (on the example of the Volyn region)]. Lutsk: Vezha. (in Ukrainian)

5. Kolodiichuk I. A. (2021) Terytoralno zbalansoavanyi pidkhid u sferi upravlinnia vidkhodamy [Territorially balanced approach in the field of waste management]. The scientific heritage, no. 68, pp. 10–14.

6. Mishchenko V. S., Vyhovska H. P. (2009) Orhanizatsiino-ekonomichnyi mekhanizm povodzhennia z vidkhodamy v Ukraini ta shliakhy yoho vdoskonalennia [Organizational and economic mechanism of waste management in Ukraine and ways of its improvement]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. (in Ukrainian)

7. Shyshpanova N. O. (2023) Suchasne upravlinnia vidkhodamy v hromadakh vidpovidno do pryntsypiv tsyrkuliarnoi ekonomiky [Modern waste management in communities according to the principles of circular economy]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and society, no. 49. Available at: https://economyandsociety.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/2323

8. Stupen N. M. (2017) Kompleksnyi ekoloho-ekonomichnyi analiz potentsialu rekreatsiinykh terytorii [Comprehensive ecological and economic analysis of the potential of recreational areas]. Efektyvna ekonomika – Efficient economy, no. 8. Available at: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=6036

9. Stupen N. M. (2017) Ekoloho-ekonomichnyi mekhanizm rozvytku rekreatsiinykh terytorii [Ecological and economic mechanism of development of recreational areas]. Kyiv: DCS-Center. (in Ukrainian)

10. Shkuratov O. I. (2016) Orhanizatsiino-ekonomichni osnovy ekolohichnoi bezpeky v ahrarnomu sektori Ukrainy: teoriia, metodolohiia, praktyka [Organizational and economic foundations of environmental safety in the agricultural sector of Ukraine: theory, methodology, practice]. Kyiv: DCS-Center. (in Ukrainian)

11. Palianychko N. I., Samoilov O. O. (2024) Rozvytok instrumentariiu orhanizatsiino-ekonomichnoho mekhanizmu upravlinnia tverdymy pobutovymy vidkhodam [Development of tools for the organizational and economic mechanism of solid household waste management]. Zbalansovane pryrodokorystuvannia – Balanced nature management, no. 1, pp. 23–29.

12. Zakhozhai V. B., Koretska O. V. (2015) Metodyka rozrakhunku intehralnoho pokaznyka innovatsiinoi spriamovanosti pidpryiemstv [Methodology for calculating the integral indicator of innovative orientation of enterprises]. Naukovi pratsi MAUP – Scientific works of IAPM, vol. 44(1), pp. 158–165.

13. Harrington E. C. (1965) The desirable function. Industrial Quality Control, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 494–498.