The influence of the management aspect of the industrial park functioning on the implementation of regional cohesion policy in Ukraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26906/EiR.2024.1(92).3307Keywords:
economic cohesion, social cohesion, territorial cohesion, industrial parks, management company, industrial park residents, agreement for the creation and operation of the industrial parkAbstract
The aim of the study is to identify potential ways in which the management company of an industrial park can influence cohesion in Ukraine. The research is based on materials from UNIDO regarding industrial parks, EU materials on cohesion, Ukrainian legislation, and the works of both Ukrainian and foreign scholars. The analysis of the development status of industrial parks in Ukraine indicates that management companies demonstrate rather low performance in fulfilling their primary function of attracting residents. Furthermore, the organizational and legal structure of the management company appears to have little significant impact, as similar low performance is observed across various forms. At this point, it's quite hard to track the impact of management companies on cohesion. The examination of various potential functions of management companies has revealed their capacity to contribute to cohesion. This applies to both the external effects stemming directly from economic activities within the industrial park and the potential terms of agreement between the management company and the industrial park residents.
References
Yezhov M. B. & Tsynalievska I. A. (2022) Mechanisms and instruments for promoting of intermunicipal economic cooperation in territorial communities of Ukraine. Regional aspects of productive forces development of Ukraine, no. 26, pp. 28–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/rarrpsu2021.26.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/rarrpsu2021.26.028
Zhalilo Ya. A. (2020) Priority “United country” in terms of regional strategies. Ukrainian Independent Center for Political Studies. Available at: http://www.ucipr.org.ua/publicdocs/Regioplat.pdf
Liakh T., Spirina T. & Kovtun Y. (2023) Rozvytok sotsialʹnoyi zhurtovanosti terytorialʹnoyi hromady [Development of social cohesion in the territorial community]. Vvichlyvist. Humanitas, no. 3, pp. 53–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/humanitas/2023.3.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/humanitas/2023.3.7
Hahaliuk O. (2023) Determination of synergic interaction possibilities and construction of a strategic development map of the “industrial enterprise – united territorial community” system in the context of the germinative vectors of development implementation. Socio-Economic Problems and the State, no. 28 (1), pp. 79–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33108/sepd2023.01.079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33108/sepd2023.01.079
Melnykova М. (2022) Promyslovyi symbioz v umovakh povoiennoho vidnovlennia ekonomiky mista [Industrial symbiosis in the conditions of post-war recovery economy of the city]. Economy and society, vol. 44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-44-106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-44-106
Petrushenko M., Burkynskyi B., Shevchenko H. & Baranchenko Ye. (2021) Towards sustainable development in a transition economy: The case of eco-industrial parks in Ukraine. Environmental Economics, no. 12(1), pp. 149–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.12(1).2021.13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.12(1).2021.13
Ryabokin M. V., Hordei O. D. & Novytska O. V. (April 18–21, 2023) Rol industrialnykh parkiv u rozvytku finansovoi spromozhnosti obiednanykh terytorialnykh hromad [The contribution of industrial parks to the development of financial capacity in territorial communities]. The 15th International scientific and practical conference “The main directions of the development of scientific research”. Helsinki, Finland. International Science Group. Pp. 113–115.
Lazarenko D., Papuk D. (2022) Pidtrymka rozvytku eko-industrialnykh parkiv v umovakh relokatsii ta yevrointehratsii biznes-protsesiv [Support for the Development of Eco-Industrial parks in Conditions of Relocation and European Integration of Business Processes]. Economic Herald of Donbas, mo. 3 (69), pp. 27–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2022-3(69)-27-30 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2022-3(69)-27-30
Pron L. (2023) Eko-industrialni parky yak instrument investytsiinoho rozvytku rehionu [Eco-Industrial Parks as a Tool for Investment Development of the Region]. Scientific Innovations and Advanced Technologies, no. 6 (20). DOI: https://doi.org/ /10.52058/2786-5274-2023-6(20)-208-217
Burkynskyi B., Bis J., Prokopiuk A. & Goryachuk V. (2023) Business Productivity Assessment: Concepts and Methods. In A. Rzepka (Ed.), Innovation in the Digital Economy: New Approaches to Management for Industry 5.0. (1st ed. рр. 160-178). London, New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003384311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003384311-14
Burkynskyi B., Goryachuk V. & Shlafman N. (2021) Assessment of the socio-economic and environmental development of a region: A result-oriented approach. Problems and Perspectives in Management, no. 19 (2), pp. 40–56. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(2).2021.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(2).2021.04
Yezhov M. B. & Kolodinskyi S. B. (2020) Network models of regional economic systems. Economic innovations, no. 22(2(75)), pp. 34–39. DOI: https://doi.org/ /10.31520/ei.2020.22.2(75).34-39 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31520/ei.2020.22.2(75).34-39
Tsynalievska I. (2023) Conceptual foundations of EU cohesion policy formation: lessons for Ukraine. In N. Letunovska, L. Saher, A. Rosokhata (Eds.). The EU Cohesion policy and healthy national development: Management and promotion in Ukraine: monograph (pp. 16-40). Centre of Sociological Research, Szczecin.
Storonyanska I. & Benovska L. (2018) Prostorovi asymetrii ekonomichnoho rozvytku v umovakh administratyvno-finansovoi detsentralizatsii [Spatial Asymmetries of Economic Development in Conditions of Administrative and Financial Decentralization]. Economy of Ukraine, no. 2, pp. 50–64. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/EkUk_2018_2_5
The Law of Ukraine “On Industrial Parks” dated June 21, 2012. No. 5018-VI. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/5018-17#doc_info
UNIDO (2019) International Guidelines for Industrial Parks. Vienna International Centre. Available at: https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/files/2019-11/International_Guidelines_for_Industrial_Parks.pdf
Register of Industrial Parks in Ukraine (2023). Available at: https://data.gov.ua/dataset/8206ed0c-5911-4b88-9c7f-56c6fcd08660
UNIDO (2017) Implementation Handbook for Eco-Industrial Parks. Available at: https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/files/2019-10/UNIDO%20Eco-Industrial%20Park%20Handbook_English.pdf
Chivu L., Ciutacu C. & Georgescu L. (2015) Household Income in Romania. A Challenge to Economic and Social Cohesion. Procedia Economics and Finance, no. 22, pp. 398–401. DOI: https://doi.org/ /10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00310-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00310-X
Macintyre A., Ferris D., Gonçalves B. & Quinn N. (2018) What has economics got to do with it? The impact of socioeconomic factors on mental health and the case for collective action. Palgrave Communications, no. 4 (1), pp. 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/ /10.1057/s41599-018-0063-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0063-2
Barker N., Gharad B., Karlan D., Ofori-Atta A., & Udry C. (2022) Cognitive Behavioral Therapy among Ghana's Rural Poor Is Effective Regardless of Baseline Mental Distress. American Economic Review: Insights, no. 4 (4), pp. 527–545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20210612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20210612
Koziuk V., Kremez A. (2023) Dyferentsiatsiia nerivnosti rozpodilu dokhodiv naselennia Ukrainy u voiennyi i povoiennyi period [Differentiation of income distribution in the population of Ukraine during the war and post-war period]. Innovation and Sustainability, no. (1), pp. 64–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31649/ins.2023.1.64.71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31649/ins.2023.1.64.71
Sudakov M. & Lisohor L. (2023) Rynok pratsi Ukrainy 2022–2023: stan, tendentsii ta perspektyvy [Labour Market of Ukraine 2022–2023: Status, Trends, and Prospects]. State Employment Service of Ukraine, Federation of Employers of Ukraine, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, International Solidarity Fund (Solidarity Fund PL). Available at: https://solidarityfund.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/ebrd_ukraine-lm-1.pdf
European Union (2022) Eighth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion. Cohesion in Europe towards 2050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2776/624081
Medeiros E., Zaucha J. & Ciołek D. (2023) Measuring territorial cohesion trends in Europe: a correlation with EU Cohesion Policy. European Planning Studies, no. 31(9), pp. 1868–1884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2143713 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2143713
Yevdokymova I. & Vitkovska І. (2018) Tendentsii rozvytku hromadskykh orhanizatsii u suchasnii Ukraini. [Trends in the development of civil organizations in contemporary Ukraine]. Bulletin of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series: Sociological Studies of Contemporary Society: Methodology, Theory, Methods, no. 41, pp. 42–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-6521-2018-41-07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-6521-2018-41-07
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
