Analysis of EU free trade agreements as one of the tools of EU economic diplomacy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26906/EiR.2023.3(90).3026

Keywords:

free trade zone, economic diplomacy, Eurostat, foreign trade, export, import

Abstract

The article summarizes the features of the the EU economic diplomacy model functioning. It was determined that the main EU institutions in the field of economic diplomacy are the European Parliament, the European Commission and the European External Affairs Service, which have functions that contribute to the implementation of EU economic diplomacy. It has been established that a common form of trade and economic relations between countries and regional associations is cooperation on the basis of free trade agreements (FTA). Hence, EU free trade agreements were analyzed and a regression analysis of the impact of EU free trade zones with other countries on EU GDP was carried out. It was determined that free trade agreements are an effective tool of economic diplomacy. It has been established that the EU has the largest trade network in the world, with more than 40 separate agreements with countries and regions that facilitate trade in products and services between the EU and its external partners. The latest EU agreements and the dynamics of trade within them were studied (the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement (2017), the EU-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (2018), the EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (2019). The annual Eurostat international trade in goods datas from 2018 to 2022 were analyzed. It was found that the COVID-19 pandemic had a negative impact on the export-import operations of the EU with Canada, Singapore and Japan during 2020. The authors used the Scatter plot model and performed regression analysis for determining which free trade area (EU-Canada, EU-Singapore or EU-Japan) affects EU GDP growth. The research model confirms a positive relationship between EU GDP growth and the growth of foreign trade turnover (FTT) between EU and Canada, EU and Japan. Regression analysis shows that 96% (EU-Canada) and 90% (EU-Japan) of changes in EU GDP are explained by changes in FTAs with the respective countries. It is proved that changes in the FTA between the EU and Singapore do not affect the state of EU GDP. It was concluded that free trade agreements contribute to the development of EU trade with other countries of the world and have a positive effect on the growth of the Union's GDP.

Author Biographies

Viktoriia Kukharyk, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University

Ph.D. (Economics), Senior Lecturer at the Department of International Economic Relations and Project Management

Olga Druzyuk, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University

Student

References

About the EU-Japan EPA. Available at: https://www.eu-japan.eu/eubusinessinjapan/procedures/economic-partnership-agreement/about-eu-japan-epa (accessed September 24, 2023).

Chohan Usman W. (2021) Economic Diplomacy: A Review. CASS Working Papers on Economics & National Affairs, Working Paper ID: EC007UC. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3762042 (accessed April 24, 2023).

EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA). Available at: https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/eu-trade-relationships-country-and-region/countries-and-regions/canada/eu-canada-agreement_en (accessed August 20, 2023).

EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement. Available at: https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/eu-trade-relationships-country-and-region/countries-and-regions/japan/eu-japan-agreement_en (accessed September 24, 2023).

EU-Singapore Free Trade Agreement and Investment Protection Agreement. Available at: https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/eu-trade-relationships-country-and-region/countries-and-regions/singapore/eu-singapore-agreement_en#:~:text=The%20EU%2DSingapore%20trade%20and,force%20on%2021%20November%202019 (accessed September 24, 2023).

Fredy B. L. Tobing, Asra Virgianita. (2020) Functional multi-track and multilevel economic diplomacy to strengthen trade relations between Indonesia, Chile, and Peru. Regions and Cohesion, vol 10, issue 1, pp. 88–107. Available at: https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/regions-and-cohesion/10/1/reco100106.xml (accessed August 20, 2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/reco.2020.100106

Geographical indications. Available at: https://europa.eu/youreurope/business/running-business/intellectual-property/geographical-indications/index_en.htm (accessed August 20, 2023).

International trade in goods. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/EXT_LT_MAINEU/default/table?lang=en (accessed August 20, 2023).

Garlick J., Havlová R. (2020) China's “Belt and Road” Economic Diplomacy in the Persian Gulf: Strategic Hedging amidst Saudi–Iranian Regional Rivalry. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, vol 49, issue 1. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/metrics/10.1177/1868102619898706 (accessed May 3, 2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1868102619898706

Ruffini P.-B. (2016) International Trade and Foreign Affairs – Some Reflections on Economic Diplomacy. Journal of International Logistics and Trade, vol 14, pp. 3–28. Available at: https://www.ejilt.org/archive/view_article?pid=jilt-14-1-3 (accessed July 4, 2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24006/jilt.2016.14.1.001

Trade agreements. Available at: https://trade.ec.europa.eu/access-to-markets/en/content/trade-agreements-0 (accessed August 20, 2023).

Kukharyk V. V., Nüblin T. (2021) The Role of Economic Diplomacy in the System of Modern International Economic Relations. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series "Economics", no. 8(2), pp. 35–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52566/msu-econ.8(2).2021.35-44 Available at: https://economics-msu.com.ua/uk/journals/tom-8-2-2021/rol-ekonomichnoyi-diplomatiyi-v-sistemi-suchasnikh-mizhnarodnikh-ekonomichnikh-vidnosin (accessed September 20, 2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.52566/msu-econ.8(2).2021.35-44

Abramova M. V. (2016) The mechanism of assessing the impact of the military-economic component on the state of economic security of the national economy: diss. ... candidate economy Sciences: 08.00.03. Higher Educational Institution "National Academy of Management". Kyiv. 165 p. Available at: http://surl.li/lvkdp (accessed April 20, 2023).

Eitutis G. (2016) Strategic analysis of key indicators of infrastructure business processes of Ukrzaliznytsia PJSC. Collection of scientific papers of the State Economic and Technological University of Transport. Ser.: Economics and management, issue 37, pp. 64–75. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Znpdetut_eiu_2016_37_9 (accessed September 20, 2023).

Ivanova V. M. (2022) Economic diplomacy as a mechanism for ensuring Ukraine's foreign economic security. Expert: paradigms of legal sciences and public administration, no. 4(22), pp. 147–155. Available at: http://journals.maup.com.ua/index.php/expert/article/view/2364/2841 (accessed September 23, 2023).

Nadolenko G. O. (2020) Priorities of the economization of Ukrainian diplomacy. International relations: theoretical and practical aspects, no. (10), pp. 35–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-745X.10.2022.269477 (accessed September 24, 2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-745X.10.2022.269477

Published

2023-09-15

How to Cite

Kukharyk, V., & Druzyuk, O. (2023). Analysis of EU free trade agreements as one of the tools of EU economic diplomacy. Economics and Region, (3(90), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.26906/EiR.2023.3(90).3026

Issue

Section

WORLD ECONOMY AND INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC RELATIONS