Theoretical and methodological aspects of measuring social cohesion

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26906/EiR.2023.1(88).2880

Keywords:

social cohesion, social capital, integration, social inclusion, measurement

Abstract

The concept of social cohesion reflects the trends and results of social, economic, political, cultural processes, combining the system of goals, tasks and conditions of the external and internal environment. Today, social cohesion is considered as one of the priority concepts of social development, focused on integration, overcoming, smoothing, and erasing inequality and unevenness in all its manifestations, limitations of sustainable social development with the aim of achieving homogeneity, stability of the social system and harmonious social development. The purpose of the study is to generalize and develop the theoretical and methodological aspects of measuring social cohesion. The generalization of the main approaches to the measurement of social cohesion made it possible to distinguish the European and harmonization approaches. The European approach to understanding and measuring social cohesion is mostly focused on access to social rights in a fair and/or egalitarian way; income and welfare. The harmonization approach is focused on the understanding of social cohesion, first of all, as a common goal and trust between members of a certain social group or region, as well as the willingness of members of a social group to interact and cooperate for the sake of prosperity, progress and development. Thus, we associate the existence of a number of ways of measuring this difficult-to-formalize process with the multidimensional and interdisciplinary nature of the application of this concept. Based on the morphological analysis of the directions for measuring social cohesion, the seven most common components were selected. The results of the research obtained by the authors will become the basis of further research in the direction of the development of analytical support for social cohesion, adapted to the domestic conditions of the development of society.

Author Biographies

Alina Demianenko, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics

Doctor of Philosophy in Economics, Lecturer of the Department of Social Economy

Oleh Ivanisov, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Social Economy

References

Berger-Schmitt, R. (2002). Considering Social Cohesion in Quality of Life Assessments: Concepts and Measurement, Social Indicators Research, 58(3), p. 403–428.

Bertelsmann, S. (2013). Social Cohesion Radar: Measuring common ground. An international comparison of social cohesion. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, pp. 76. [b01]

Chan, J., To, H. & Chan, E. (2006). Reconsidering social cohesion: developing a definition and analytical framework for empirical research, Social Indicators Research, 75, p. 273–302.

Council of Europe (2001). Promoting the Policy Debate on Social Exclusion from a Comparative Perspective. Strasbourg: Trends in Social Cohesion.

Dickes, P., Valentova, M., & Borsenberger, M. (2009). Construct Validation and Application of a common Measure of Social Cohesion in 33 European Countries. Social Indicators Research, 98(3), 451–473.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9551-5.

Dickes, P. (2010). Mesure de la cohésion sociale dans l’enquête EVS Europe 2008. Documents Techniques, 25.

Dickes, P., Valentova, M., & Borsenberger, M. (2008). Social cohesion: Measurement based on the EVS micro-data. Statistical Applicata, (Italian Journal of Applied Statistics) 2(20), p. 1–16.

Easterly, W., Ritzen, J. & Woolcock, M. (2006). Social Cohesion, Institutions and Growth. Economics and Politics, 18(2), p. 103–120.

ECLAC (2007). Social Cohesion. Inclusion and a Sense of Belonging in Latin America and the Caribbean. United Nations, New York.

Jenson, J. (2010). Defining and measuring social cohesion, UNRIS and Commonwealth Secretariat.

Kearns, A. & Forrest, R. (2000). Social Cohesion and Multi-Level Urban Governance. Urban Studies, 37, p. 995–1017.

Kim, J., Sheely, R., & Schmidt, C. (2020). Social Capital and Social Cohesion Measurement Toolkit for Community-Driven Development Operations. Washington, DC: Mercy Corps and The World Bank Group.

Langer, A., Stewart, F., Smedts, K., & Demarest L. (2017). Conceptualising and Measuring Social Cohesion in Africa: Towards a Perceptions-Based Index. Soc Indic Res, 131, p. 321–343.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1250-4.

Available at: https://www.socialcohesion.info/fileadmin/user_upload/2017_Article_.pdf.

OECD (2011). Society at a Glance: Asia/Pacific 2011.

Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264106154-en.

UNDP (2019). Social Cohesion and Reconciliation (SCORE) Index. Available at: https://scoreforpeace.org/ [SCORE]

Walesiak, M., & Dehnel, G. (2020). The Measurement of Social Cohesion at Province Level in Poland Using Metric and Interval-Valued Data. Sustainability, 12, 7664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187664.

Grynenko, A. M., & Kyrylyuk, V. V. (2016). Social cohesion of society in conditions of democracy. Bulletin of Kamianets-Podilskyi National University named after Ivan Ohienko (Economic sciences), 11, p. 220–226.

Kyrylyuk, V. V. (2014). Modern approaches to determining the level of social cohesion of society. Social and labor relations: theory and practice, 1,

p. 384–389.

Published

2023-05-08

How to Cite

Demianenko, A., & Ivanisov, O. (2023). Theoretical and methodological aspects of measuring social cohesion. Economics and Region, (1(88), 108–113. https://doi.org/10.26906/EiR.2023.1(88).2880

Issue

Section

DEMOGRAPHY, LABOR ECONOMICS, SOCIAL ECONOMICS AND POLICIES