Machine Diagnostics in Mechatronic Systems: Analysis Methods and Intelligent Technologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26906/znp.2025.64.4146Keywords:
machine diagnostics, machine learning, mechatronic systems, CNN, LSTM, signal processing, condition prediction, digital twins, vibration analysisAbstract
The article examines modern approaches to machine diagnostics within mechatronic systems using signal processing methods and intelligent machine learning technologies. The structure of mechatronic complexes is analyzed, and their specific features that influence the development of diagnostic models are identified, including the high level of interdependence between mechanical, electronic, and software components. The feasibility of applying hybrid diagnostic systems is substantiated, where convolutional neural networks (CNN) are employed for automatic extraction of informative features from vibration and sensor data, while recurrent networks such as LSTM provide analysis of the temporal dynamics of processes and prediction of degradation states. A generalized theoretical diagnostic model is proposed, combining spectral methods of preliminary signal processing, multisensor data integration, and modules for technical condition prediction. The obtained results demonstrate the high effectiveness of intelligent algorithms in detecting early signs of faults, even under noise disturbances and varying operating modes. The proposed approach can be applied in maintenance systems at industrial enterprises to enhance the reliability and extend the service life of mechatronic systems.
References
1. Lei, Y., Yang, B., Jiang, X., Jia, F., Li, N., & Nandi, A. K. (2020). Applications of machine learning to machine fault diagnosis: A review and roadmap. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 138, 106587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106587
2. Khan, S., & Yairi, T. (2018). A review on the application of deep learning in system health management. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 107, 241–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.11.024
3. Janssens, O., Slavkovikj, V., Vervisch, B., Stockman, K., Loccufier, M., Verstockt, S., & Van de Walle, R. (2016). Convolutional neural network based fault detection for rotating machinery. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 377, 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2016.05.027
4. Widodo, A., & Yang, B.-S. (2007). Support vector machine in machine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 21(6), 2560–2574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.12.007
5. Zhao, R., Yan, R., Chen, Z., Mao, K., Wang, P., & Gao, R. X. (2019). Deep learning and its applications to machine health monitoring. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 115, 213–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.05.050
6. Guo, L., Li, N., Jia, F., Lei, Y., & Lin, J. (2017). A recurrent neural network based health indicator for remaining useful life prediction of bearings. Neurocomputing, 240, 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.02.045
7. Carvalho, T. P., Soares, F. A. A. M. N., Vita, R., Francisco, R. D. P., Basto, J. P., & Alcalá, S. G. S. (2019). A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 137, 106024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106024
8. Zhang, X., Wang, C., & Gao, L. (2022). Digital twin-driven predictive maintenance: A review. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 73, 102222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2021.102222
9. Barcelos, A. S., & Cardoso, A. J. M. (2021). Current-based bearing fault diagnosis using deep learning algorithms. Energies, 14(9), 2509. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14092509
10. Tao, F., Qi, Q., Liu, A., & Kusiak, A. (2018). Data-driven smart manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 48, 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.01.006
11. Kritzinger, W., Karner, M., Traar, G., Henjes, J., & Sihn, W. (2018). Digital Twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(11), 1016–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474
12. Lu, Y., Liu, C., Wang, K. I.-K., Huang, H., & Xu, X. (2020). Digital Twin-driven smart manufacturing: Connotation, reference model, applications and research issues. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 61, 101837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101837
13. Yin, S., Ding, S. X., Xie, X., & Luo, H. (2014). A review on basic data-driven approaches for industrial process monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 61(11), 6418–6428. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2014.2301773
14. Si, X.-S., Wang, W., Hu, C.-H., & Zhou, D.-H. (2011). Remaining useful life estimation – A review on the statistical data driven approaches. European Journal of Operational Research, 213(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.11.018
15. Jardine, A. K. S., Lin, D., & Banjevic, D. (2006). A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 20(7), 1483–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.09.012
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Serhii Oryschenko, Viktor Oryscshenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
