Syndicate-type network groups in the global governance paradigm
Abstract
The topic of the article reveals the complex and controversial problem of forming new priorities, principles and mechanisms of global management. At the same time, it is recognized that the traditional management paradigm can no longer satisfy the realization of the strategic interests of either states, corporations, or organizations, which is why alternative centers of global power are gradually being singled out and formed, which try to be extraterritorial and absorb into their own structure, first of all, financial credit institutions, as well as industrial innovation and resource distribution centers. The purpose of the study is to determine the key elements of reinstitutionalization and its organizational design in the conditions of deepening conflict realities and the emergence of new alternative centers of global power. It is emphasized that the result of this is an alternative global government formed on the principle of a syndicate, which determines a favorable market situation and the main directions of monetary policy. It is emphasized that the new management paradigm, built on the network principle, will include several institutional levels under the control of which will be the sovereign economic prerogatives of a significant number of national states. In particular, we are talking about currency regulation, atomic energy, armed forces, raw resources, etc. By establishing new UN powers and launching new institutions of global governance, these traditional areas of national sovereignty are supposed to be delegated to global authorities. It is emphasized that the problem of preserving national economic sovereignty can be solved only by states with certain strategic development orientations that have the appropriate resource and demographic potential. As a conclusion, the idea is proposed that the destruction of the new management paradigm and the formation of a new one will occur as a result of the practical inability of most existing institutions to foresee and solve global problems, the key of which is the lack of effective control tools for the accumulation and redistribution of the resource base.
References
2. Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas. Global economy to slow further amid signs of resilience and China re-openong.
Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/authors?author=Pierre-Olivier%20Gourinchas
3. China Statistical Yearboоk - 2019. Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation. 11-2. Total Value of Imports and Exports of Goods. Available at: www.atats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2019/indexeh.htm
4. Rozkrito poryadok denniy Vsesvitnyoho Ekonomichnoho Forumu v Davosi u 2923 rotzi [The agenda of the World Economic Forum in Davos in 2023 has been revealed]. Available at: https://lenta.ua/rozkrito-poryadok-denniy-vsesvitnogo-ekonomichnogo-forumu-v-davosi-u-2023-rotsi-130202/
5. Ludmila Tzimbal. (2019) Intellektual’ne liderstvo v paradyhme global’noho economichnoho rozvytku [Intellectual leadership in the paradigm of global economic development] Momograph. Kyiv : KNEU. 343 p.
6. O/Plahotnik, A.Pavlenko. Vplyv h;obalizazii nf rozvytol svitovoyi ekonomiki ta ekonomiki Ukrainy [The impact of globalization on the development of the world economy and the economy of Ukraine]. Ekonomika ta derzava [Economics and the State]. №5. 2022. P.62–67.
7. O.Minyalo. Ekonomichna polityka derzavy za umov hlobal’noi pandemii [Economic policy of the state under the conditions of a global pandemic]//Visnyk Kyivskoho Nazionalnoho Torhovel’no-Ekonomichnoho Universitetu [Kyiv National Trade and Economic University Herald]. №1. 2022. P. 26–44.
8. S.Didenko. Hlobal’na ekonomika: paradoksy potochnych tentenzii ta prohnoz [Global economy: paradoxes of current trends and forecast]. Available at: https://ua.news/ua/money/globalnaya-ekonomyka-paradoksy-tekushhyh-tendentsyj-y-prognoz
9. Kalchenko, Tymur V. Sovremennye transformazionnye praktiki hlobaliynoy ekonomiki [Modern transformative practices of the global economy]. Riga : Palmarium Academic Publishing, 2018, 132 p.
10. Tymur Kalchenko. (2021) Kryza hlobalizazii i problema stabilizatzii ekonomichnoho rozvitku [Crisis of globalization and the problem of stabilization of economic development]. Naukovyi visnyk Poltavs’koho universytetu Elonomiki i Torhivli. Seryia «Ekonomichni nauki» [Poltava University of Economics and Trade Scientific Herald. Sery «Economic sciences»] №2(103). P.76–80.
11. Waltz K. Globalization and American Power. The National Interest. Spring. 2020. P.49–56.
12. Coase, Ronald H. (2018) “The Nature of the Firm”, in Coase, Ronald H. (ed.), The Firm, the Market and the Law, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. 259 p.
13. Cerny P. (2021) Paradoxes of the Competition State: The Dynamics of Political Globalisation. Government and Opposition. №32 (2).. P.251–274.
14. Wilson M.G., Whitmore E. (2019) Seeds of Fire. Social Development in an Era of Globalism. N.Y. 345 p.
15. Waters M. (2018) Globalization. Fifth Edition. London : Routledge. 675 p.
16. Mohamed El-Ernan. The paradox of financial conditions.
Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/7eb30653-2cfa-4c9e-b968-34749c3116e3
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
