Assessment of the quality of management of the reconstruction of an immovable object of historical development of the city
Abstract
The economic evaluation of the work in progress is the basis for the evaluation of the construction management. The planned course of management is designed on the basis of the actual determination of the initial state of object management and the expected forecast of its state in the future. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the method of measuring the quality of management as a simulation of the function of calendar planning and management on the example of the calendar schedule "Management of reconstruction of an immovable object of the historical building of the city of Odessa". The research was carried out by the method of modelling the function of calendar planning and management (a model of the management process – a calendar schedule) with the help of the assessment of the timeliness of works. It is proposed to create in the city of Odessa the "Corporate scientific and technical complex town-planning power reconstruction "CSTC T-PPR", as an innovative organisational structure, which will use in practice the accumulated scientific and technical potential for reconstruction of buildings of the historical development of Odessa according to energy efficiency standards with the involvement of foreign experience. Any general process of management of immovable property of a historical monument consists of individual management of interdependent processes: organisational, labour, information and others. A generally accepted way of their dynamic representation is a calendar plan. As the calendar plan systematically combines the economy, organisation and technology of construction production and shows the execution of works in time, it is a dynamically regulated structure. The procedure described for measuring the quality of management allows the index of the quality of management to be calculated dynamically, taking into account iteration. Moreover, this index can be used to determine the degree of responsibility of the managers of specific works. The presented model of assessing the quality of management is adequate because it is based on the modern concept of assessing the effectiveness of investment projects. In principle, this model is adaptable. However, it is necessary to take into account the dependence of the discount rate on time in order to obtain an optimal effect. Finally, the model is effective because it allows to dynamically evaluate the result of management activities and to make fairly detailed forecasts of the development of the management process.
References
2. Posternak, I. M. (2020). Orhanizatsiia vyrobnytstva rekonstruktsii budivel istorychnoi zabudovy mist: zvit pro NDR z 01.01.2017 po 31.12.2020 (promizhnyi) / Odeska derzh. akademiia budivnytstva ta arkhitektury; ker. I. M. Posternak. Shyfr temy 55-NDR/VI № derzhreiestratsii 0117U002172. Odessa, 74 s.
3. Ulu, M., & Arsan, Z.D. (2020). Retrofit strategies for energy efficiency of historic urban fabric in Mediterranean climate. Atmosphere, 11(7), 742. doi:10.3390/atmos11070742
4. Fouseki, K., Newton, D., Murillo Camacho, K.S., Nandi, S., & Koukou, T. (2020). Energy efficiency, thermal comfort, and heritage conservation in residential historic buildings as dynamic and systemic socio-cultural practices. Atmosphere, 11(6), 604. doi:10.3390/atmos11060604
5. Konior, J., & Szóstak, M. (2020). The S-curve as a tool for planning and controlling of construction process – case study. Applied Sciences, 10(6), 2071. doi:10.3390/app10062071
6. Kepakisan, I.W., Paturusi, S.A., Dwijendra, N.K.A., & Putra, D.G.A.D. (2021). Research on reconstruction of historical buildings. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 6(1), 32-39. doi:10.24843/IJEET.2021.v06.i01.p06
7. Ředina, T. (2019). Reconstruction of the historical building Foksal 13 and 15 in Warsaw. Acta Polytechnica CTU Proceedings, 23, 44-48. doi:10.14311/APP.2019.23.0044
8. Borowski, M. (2022). Hotel adapted to the requirements of an nZEB building – thermal energy performance and assessment of energy retrofit plan. Energies, 15(17), 6332. doi:10.3390/en15176332
9. Qu, W., Li, M.J., Zhang, X.Q., & Wang, Z. (2019). Management processes reconstruction of historical buildings supported by smart technology – a case study of Fuzhou city. The International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, XLII-2/W15, 953–956. doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-953-2019
10. Yarrow, T. (2019). How conservation matters: ethnographic explorations of historic building renovation. Journal of Material Culture, 24(1), 3-21. doi:10.1177/1359183518769111
11. Neves-Silva, R., & Camarinha-Matos, LM. (2022). Simulation-based decision support system for energy efficiency in buildings retrofitting. Sustainability, 14(19), 12216. doi:10.3390/su141912216
12. Przywara, D., & Rak, A. (2021). Monitoring of time and cost variances of schedule using simple earned value method indicators. Applied Sciences, 11(4), 1357. doi:10.3390/app11041357
13. Leśniak, A., & Zima, K. (2018). Cost calculation of construction projects including sustainability factors using the Case Based Reasoning (CBR) method. Sustainability, 10(5), 1608. doi:10.3390/su10051608
14. Chen, H.L., Chen, W.T., & Lin, Y.L. (2016). Earned value project management: Improving the predictive power of planned value. International Journal of Project Management, 34(1), 22-29. Retrieved from doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.09.008
15. Milat, M., Knezić, S., & Sedlar J. (2021). Resilient scheduling as a response to uncertainty in construction projects. Applied Sciences, 11(14), 6493. doi:10.3390/app11146493
16. Szafranko, E., & Harasymiuk, J. (2022). Modelling of decision processes in construction activity. Applied Sciences, 12(8), 3797. doi:10.3390/app12083797
17. Rachid, Z., Toufik, B., & Mohammed, B. (2019). Causes of schedule delays in construction projects in Algeria. International Journal of Construction Management, 19(5), 371-381. doi:10.1080/15623599.2018.1435234
18. Eltoukhy, M.G., & Nassar, A.H. (2021). Using support vector machine (SVM) for time and cost overrun analysis in construction projects in Egypt. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 12(3), 5-22. doi:10.34218/IJCIET.12.3.2021.002
19. Harjanto, R., Azis, S. & Hidayat, S. (2019). The accelerating of duration and change of cost on construction project implementation. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 10(1), 825-832. Retrieved from https://iaeme.com/Home/article_id/IJCIET_10_01_075
20. Begaliev J. M., & Yusupov X.I. (2022). Determination of time, space and financial parameters of the model of organization of calendar plan of Jizak car plant construction, analysis and resource of results. Eurasian Journal of Engineering and Technology, 6, 129-131. Retrieved from https://geniusjournals.org/index.php/ejet/article/view/1448
21. Lalu, M., Tiong, I., & Shidqul., A.M. (2019). Application of Fast Track Method to accelerate project implementation time in the hospital construction. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Science, 3(11), 49-53. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3578041
